Blaming the Victim, Yet Again
John Timmer of Ars Technica writes about how we ignore dialog boxes in, “Fake popup study sadly confirms most users are idiots.”
The article reports that researchers at the Psychology Department of North Carolina State University created a number of fake dialog boxes had varying sorts of clues that they were not real dialog boxes, but sham ones. The sham dialog boxes had varying levels of visual clues to help the user think they were sham. One of the fake dialogs is here:
The conclusion of many people is summed up in the title of the Ars Technica — that people are idiots.
My opinion is that this is blaming the victim. Users are presented with such a variety of elements that it’s hard to know what’s real and what’s not. Worse, there are so many worthless dialogs that pop up during normal operation that we’re all trained to play whack-a-mole with them.
I confess to being as bad as anyone. My company has SSL set up to the mail server, but it’s a locally-generated certificate. So every time I fire up the mail client, there’s a breathless dialog telling me that the certificate isn’t a real certificate. Do you know what this has taught me? To be able to whack the okay button before the dialog finishes painting.
The idiots are the developers who give people worthless dialog boxes, who make it next to impossible to import in local certificates, who train people to just make the damned dialog go away.
Computing isn’t safe primarily because the software expects the user to be a continuously alert expert. If the users are idiots, it is only because they stand for this.